VETER ROBOTICS
RU|EN
+7 910 048-27-03

Where ground robots work in 2026: civilian applications

Where ground robots work in 2026: civilian applications

Ground robots have moved off the test site and into daily work. Here are five areas where tracked and wheeled machines already do jobs people used to do, with places and numbers from 2026.

Sidewalk delivery. In Leeds and Sheffield, six-wheeled robots deliver food ordered through an app. The operator reports about 3,000 machines in more than 270 towns and cities; a typical delivery takes up to 30 minutes over a distance of up to three kilometers. In 2026 the service is expanding into other European markets.

Field work. Two field machines were unveiled in California in February. The first is a laser weeder: cameras find the weed and a laser kills it with no herbicide, for claimed savings of up to 80% on weed control. The second is a kit that turns an ordinary tractor into a driverless one: the machine follows its route by itself, and the operator can take over at any moment. In effect, a robotic platform takes on the work a compact tractor does on a small farm.

Quarries and mines. This is where the largest autonomous fleets are. In August 2026 the first batch of fully electric autonomous haul trucks shipped to South America. Another manufacturer shipped more than 1,900 autonomous haul trucks in the first half of 2026; they work at nearly 40 mines, seven of which run fleets of more than 100 machines, and the largest fleet numbers 220. The robots haul rock, push spoil on the dumps, load coal and feed it to the crusher. One manufacturer's autonomous trucks have logged more than 13 million km and moved more than 41 million cubic meters of rock.

Grounds maintenance. In September 2026, professional mowers for parks, campuses and large properties were introduced in Berlin. In the UK, robotic mowing is used by contractors, municipalities and property managers; solar farms are a niche of their own, with grass cut between the rows of panels. The machines hold their route by satellite, lidar and cameras to within centimeters, with no boundary wire around the perimeter. Working areas run from 8,000 to 28,000 square meters. In winter the same grounds are covered by a snow-removal robot: a tracked chassis with attachments clears the roads and paths.

Security and inspection. Near Melbourne, a four-legged robot walks the rounds at a plant and an industrial park. One machine covers two jobs: perimeter security, with intruder recognition and camera tracking, and equipment inspection, where photos are taken from the same spots every time so that frames can be compared from one round to the next. Recognition runs on board, so the round continues if the network goes down. In Taiwan, similar machines were shown in June for patrolling coastlines and islands.

What all these areas have in common. The work comes down to three things: carrying cargo along a known route, making regular rounds of a site, and observing with a record. It is monotonous, it is long, and it is done in conditions that are hard or dangerous for people.

What we do. VETER Robotics has work of its own in four of these five areas. The VETER TEGU tracked platform hauls the raspberry harvest along the rows of a berry farm - the same known-route transport as in field work abroad. For orchards we are training the Smotritel neural network, which analyzes footage from the robot's camera and separates crop from weed. The VETER SCINK tracked platform clears snow with a snow-removal attachment. The VETER AGAMA patrol robot for perimeter security is in development; for it we are building a detector that tells a person from an animal and spots a fire starting. A project in its own right is SARA OS, our operating system for ground robots: it controls the drives, interprets the surroundings and keeps the link to the operator's tablet.

Some of the figures from abroad come from manufacturers' own statements and have not been independently verified.

Find us on MAX and Telegram: development and field trials, as they happen (in Russian).

NEWS

More news

What a ground robot's navigation sees when its localization goes off track

What a ground robot's navigation sees when its localization goes off track

Experience, the son of hard mistakes A robot moves through an orchard slower than a person walks, and its navigation suddenly reports that it's racing along at 180 km/h. That's how the onboard DLIO localization system behaved on the VETER TEGU. A localization system calculates the machine's position from sensor data. DLIO works as a satellite-free onboard navigation system: the lidar scans the surroundings with a laser, a motion sensor picks up turns and jolts, and the software compares each new scan with the previous one to work out how far the robot has moved. If that comparison goes wrong even once, the error carries forward. FAST-LIO2 solves the same problem with the same set of sensors. What the machine saw. In the field recordings, with DLIO running live, the speed it reported would jump after a few minutes of driving - from a slow crawl to noticeably faster in a single step - and then within a few seconds climb to 180 km/h. The position drifted along with this imaginary speed, and the recorded route ballooned into tens of kilometers. How the cause was found. VETER ROBOTICS engineers replayed the same field-day recording on the onboard hardware through a different system, FAST-LIO2. The route measured by RTK satellite positioning was 332.4 m. FAST-LIO2 disagreed with it by only a few percent, while DLIO came up with 20,653 m. Same input data, different result. So the cause had to be in the position calculation itself. A caveat: this was a replayed recording. FAST-LIO2 was not driving the machine. These tests took place back in May. DLIO is only one of the localization loops in VETER ROBOTICS robots, and this analysis concerns it alone. At VETER ROBOTICS the systems are constantly being improved, and every update is run on test benches first.

What stops a ground robot at a plant? An ordinary closed door

What stops a ground robot at a plant? An ordinary closed door

You would think a ground robot's worst enemies are stairs, mud and a dead battery. In practice, what stops an inspection machine at an industrial site most often is an ordinary closed door. That story and the rest of the week's news - in our roundup of the ground robotics industry. According to The Robot Report, ANYbotics, together with dormakaba and LEGIC, has taught the four-legged ANYmal robot to pass through doors that open only with an electronic access badge. Doors like these stand at power plants, in chemical plants and at mines - you don't get in without a badge. Now the robot gets access like an employee: the door opens for it under the same rules and with the same entry in the log, and the building needs no modifications. The solution was tested at an operating facility, and it can now be added to any ANYmal machine already in service. The point is simple: an equipment inspection round only counts if the machine reaches every unit, and a closed door was the final barrier. The second story comes from the labs. Tech Xplore Robotics writes that engineers at UCLA and the University of Michigan have built an experimental frog-like robot on elastic rods that bend and twist. Across six different types of terrain, this design proved faster than traditional rigid legs. Farm use is still a long way off - this is locomotion research. But the direction is intriguing: softness instead of rigidity could come in handy where rigid legs slip, for example on loose, uneven ground. The week's third topic is reliability. The Robot Report is announcing a panel discussion by engineers from WiBotic, Burro and Nextpower at an industry conference: they will dig into why outdoor robots break down. The causes are familiar to anyone who runs equipment: temperature swings, water, dust-clogged connectors, vibration. A machine that drives beautifully around a lab fails in completely different ways outdoors. And fourth - tools for developers. On the ROS Discourse forum, where robot builders talk shop, Mission Canvas was presented: a program in which a machine's individual skills are assembled into a coherent route - where to go, what to do there and where to head next. It's a tool for the people who configure robots; a machine's owner doesn't need it directly, but it's tools like these that will one day let a robot do all this on its own. Where does VETER ROBOTICS fit in? The VETER TEGU tracked platform hauls the raspberry harvest along the rows of a berry farm - the same hauling along a known route that foreign field machines do. And the VETER SCINK tracked platform with a snow blower attachment works as a snow removal robot: it clears snow on roads and walkways.

What drains a robot's battery in an orchard: turns at the end of the row

What drains a robot's battery in an orchard: turns at the end of the row

You would think the faster a machine goes, the more energy it burns per kilometer. A test on the VETER TEGU tracked platform showed that's almost true, but the difference is smaller than you'd expect: at a steady pace from 1.4 to 3.3 km/h, consumption per kilometer rises with speed by about 10%, and above 4 km/h we have no data yet - that measurement is still to come. A turn at the end of the row, on the other hand, costs about four times as much as driving straight. The tracked chassis carries an onboard data logger - a device that automatically records current and speed while the machine works. It logged 4 days of a ground robot working in an orchard: about 3.6 hours of driving, unloaded, on gentle orchard slopes of up to 5 degrees. Only the motor current went into the measurement. The onboard electronics aren't included, even though they run all the time, even when parked, and draw an estimated 39 W - roughly like a small light bulb. So the real battery drain is slightly higher than the figures below - by that same light bulb. Most of the work happened driving straight at about 2.3 km/h - slower than a person's normal walking pace. Two things are worth distinguishing here: power is how much energy the motors are pulling right now, while consumption is how much will be spent per kilometer of travel. Driving straight at about 2.3 km/h, consumption is 1.9 Ah per kilometer. At a steady pace on level ground, consumption per kilometer rises with speed: 1.8 Ah per kilometer at 1.4 km/h and 2.0 Ah per kilometer at 3.3 km/h - a difference of about 10%. Above 4 km/h we have almost no data, so there are no conclusions yet - that measurement is still to come. What this means for a farm: the robot's speed determines how fast the battery drains over time, while consumption per kilometer of row barely changes. Covering the same row at 3.3 km/h instead of 1.4 km/h means spending about 10% more per kilometer, but in noticeably less time. A turn is a different story. The machine turns slowly, at about 1.6 km/h, but the motors pull noticeably more than they do driving straight. If you convert a turn into a kilometer of that kind of movement, you get 7.8 Ah per kilometer at about 1.6 km/h - roughly four times a kilometer of straight driving. The conclusion VETER ROBOTICS engineers give orchard owners is simple: the longer the rows and the fewer turns on the route, the farther the machine will go on a single charge. One nice detail to finish with: when the machine stands still, motor current is zero and measured power is 0 W - only the electronics are running, with their calculated 39 W. A pause in the work costs almost nothing. And over all 4 days the motors never heated above 41 degrees - warmer than a human hand, but a long way from overheating.

CONTACT

Tell us what you need done

Describe the job and the conditions, and we'll tell you whether a standard machine will handle it or it calls for custom work.

PHONE

+7 910 048-27-03

Voice calls only.
SEND AN INQUIRY

@veter_contact_bot

Sent via Telegram. We'll reply in the same chat.
EMAIL

info@veter.tech

For correspondence and documents.
FOLLOW US

Telegram MAX

Development news and field trials (in Russian).
REGIONAL DEALERS

Where to buy